From 03bc80e4e2f2a3fe9414b61cdd4eb9e0d168e40c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: totositesport Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 20:59:19 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update 'How to Evaluate Category Based Link Curation for Media, Sports, and Web Content' --- ...ased-Link-Curation-for-Media%2C-Sports%2C-and-Web-Content.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/How-to-Evaluate-Category-Based-Link-Curation-for-Media%2C-Sports%2C-and-Web-Content.md b/How-to-Evaluate-Category-Based-Link-Curation-for-Media%2C-Sports%2C-and-Web-Content.md index 7ec3d04..52d0d7d 100644 --- a/How-to-Evaluate-Category-Based-Link-Curation-for-Media%2C-Sports%2C-and-Web-Content.md +++ b/How-to-Evaluate-Category-Based-Link-Curation-for-Media%2C-Sports%2C-and-Web-Content.md @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ A category system can look excellent when first built and still age badly. As content changes, categories need maintenance. New destinations appear, older resources change purpose, and previously useful labels may become too broad or too narrow. That's where maintainability becomes a serious quality measure. A directory with many highly specific sections may require constant attention. A simpler structure may be easier to update without sacrificing usefulness. -This is one reason I’d evaluate **[링크창고 content categories](https://linkchango.com/)** not only by how organized they appear today, but by how easily the structure can absorb change. +This is one reason I’d evaluate **[링크창고](https://linkchango.com/) content categories** not only by how organized they appear today, but by how easily the structure can absorb change. A strong taxonomy should bend without breaking. My recommendation is to avoid creating a new category every time a slightly different type of content appears. Expand the system only when users genuinely benefit from the distinction.